Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nick Chappell vs Hynek Barton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chappell vs Barton analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Chappell vs Hynek Barton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chappell 1 - 0 Barton
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chappell has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Barton has won 48.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chappell, in recent form, has won 50.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Barton has won 49.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.87% and 34.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chappell has saved 58.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barton has saved 57.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chappell has won 53.01% of matches played (W/L 44/ 39), with Barton winning 63.08% (W/L 41/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 217/ 148), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Barton has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 17/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.27% of matches (W/L 31/ 18), where as Barton has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.04% of matches (W/L 35/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chappell winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chappell winning 2 and Barton winning 0. The last match between Chappell and Barton was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 20-02-2024, First, Hard with Nick Chappell getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chappell and Barton have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chappell winning 0 times and Barton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chappell winning 0, and Barton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chappell has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.65 while Barton has played against players with an average rank of 204.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chappell has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barton has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chappell has converted 41.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barton has converted 39.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chappell 1 - 0 Barton
436
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
434
Rank
434
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
53% (303-266)
Career Total W/L
63% (64-37)
44% (12-15)
YTD W/L
50% (6-6)
$24,525
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nick Chappell | Hynek Barton |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (33/52) | 71% (42/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (24/33) | 52% (22/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 35% (6/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (31/59) | 37% (19/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Nick Chappell
Player
Hynek Barton
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nick Chappell | Hynek Barton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (12/15) | 50% (6/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (28/34) | 48% (12/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (283/292) | 49% (117/122) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (9/9) | 67% (6/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.62 |
| Aces Total | 68 | 73 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 49 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:6 | 1:36:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.3 | 284.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1146/1840) | 57% (441/780) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (764/1146) | 67% (295/441) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (341/694) | 50% (169/339) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (79/197) | 42% (31/73) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (747/1899) | 40% (309/779) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (10/9) | 60% (6/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (12/27) | 50% (6/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 0% (6/0) |
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Nick Chappell
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Kousuke Ogura
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Andres Delgadillo
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nick Chappell
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Elijah Strode
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
2
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
10
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
24 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
30 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(17) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
15
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Hynek Barton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Hynek Barton
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
14 of
31)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
42
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
49%
(
57 of
116)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
46 of
72)
54%
(
32 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Andres Fernandez Canovas
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Salvatore Caruso
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
17
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Hynek Barton
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Tiago Pereira
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Hynek Barton
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Hynek Barton
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chappell Vs Barton Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
